Reading Interaction Journal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Reading Interaction Journal - Essay Example He refers to this feeling as the ‘delusion of reprieve’. According to Victor it becomes easy for an outsider to get the wrong conception of the prison life, a conception that is mingled with sentiment and pity (Pg. 4). A constant danger of death threatened the life of prisoners, and the closeness of death affect the hopelessly borne individual to be affected psychologically. The first group of the prisoners did not few the threat of death or the fume chambers. Being in the prison the thought to commit suicide of the threat of death lost meaning and the mention of chambers lost their horrors (Pg.36-37. The quotes from this book can tell you how traumatic the life in prison must have been. The use of transport to move prisoners to another camp was just a simple guess that the final destination of that transport was the chambers. A selection of the sick and weak prisoners would be done and sent to one of the big central camp which was fitted with gas chambers and crematoriu ms (Pg. 4). I believed these prisoners went through a lot of traumatic experience that it is difficult and stressful to talk about. Like for the case of transport a definite of prisoners had to be taken, it didn’t matter since each of them was nothing but numbers. With the thought of coming trip there was no time to behave morally, the only thought that crossed the prisoners mind was to find another number to replace him for the sake of family waiting for him back at home. The food that the prisoners were being fed was horrible bits of small amounts of bread and watery soup. The water that they used for bathing was not good and without nourishment, their bodies started to crack and that made even harder for the prisoners to survive the camp. The prisoner’s life is described to be in two faces. The fear of death and chamber being the first face of their stay. Victor goes ahead and narrates about the second face of prisoner’s life. The second face is where the pri soners were assigned jobs according your number. Some worked as doctors while others did the hard labour like digging the tunnels, trenches and laying trucks for railway line. The works done by the prisoners did not go unrewarded, Frankl, says that they were presented with ‘premium coupons’, which were issued by the construction firms to which the prisoners were practically sold as slaves in exchange of pay to the prison authorities a fixed price per day, per prisoner. After the initial shock of tortured had subsidized, numbness overcome prisoners, where they can be beaten to death and they don’t even bat an eye. Frankl recalls his time while taking care of a typhoid patients, he would watch people die horrible death hour after hour and he would not experience any emotional problems or upset. Prisoners used the emotional control as their form of self-defence which channelled all their emotions to one objective, survive. He categorises the stay in prison in three phases, the period of admission, period when he is well entrenched in camp routine, and the period following his release and liberation. Shock is feature that happens during the phase of admission and sometimes it precedes the admission phase. During admission phase the transportation system is always the poor one and nearly everyone in the transport were delusional that the situation will change and everything will be well. The never realise to find the

Doctrine of Determinism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Doctrine of Determinism - Essay Example All the elements that make the world function are constantly interacting with each other. These interactions follow a certain order (cosmic) sometimes. At other times these functional elements are in a state of disorder (chaos). The interactions categorize the world into two kinds. The first is the phenomenal world, which stands tall on our perception of reality. The second is the deterministic world, which advocates a sure-shot perspective on everything that happens. Consequently, a phenomenal world is an outcome of chance and randomness; while the deterministic world leaves no scope for chance or probability, apparently. But what is obvious is not always true. Recent scientific studies have put forth randomness as central to the universe. A physical being's genetic make up is the result of certain permutations and combinations that are purely random. So an individual is a consequence of cosmic coincidence! Biology justifies that. The Oxford dictionary defines chance as a possibility of something happening. Probability and likelihood are the other synonyms. In fact, we devise logic on the basis of chance. There are infinite situations when probabilistic logic becomes the foundation for sound reason and subsequent action. The notion of expected utility is the outcome of the probabilistic calculus. I work hard because I think it betters my chances to succeed. The practical dimension of chance makes it the central element in the otherwise deterministic world! Determinism is an apparent antonym of chance. Determinism looks so scientifically grounded, but it has a philosophical foundation in the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR). German rationalist, Leibniz, an adherent to this principle used it extensively in his philosophical findings. According to the Principle of Sufficient Reason, there is a reason why something happens in a particular way and not in some other way. It is a powerful principle. It defies the existence of chance in the real world. So if chance exists, then Principle of Sufficient Reason fails. Perhaps. Perhaps not. So we might observe that determinism is an offshoot of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Both the concepts seem to be in synergy. Determinism defies chance and so does the Principle of sufficient reason. So how are the two concepts different The Principle of Sufficient Reason seems to justify the concept of rational thought. But a detailed analysis brings out something drastically different. If this principle is to be believed, then there has to be a justification for anything and everything. Subsequently, there has to be a reason as to why there should be a reason for anything to happen. But Leibniz has offered no explanation for this. It is an underived principle. So what is the rationale for something, which has no reason or logic The explanation of the principle refutes its existence. Strange paradox. Another interesting concept that is significant in the explanation of the Principle of Sufficient Reason vis--vis the concept of determinism is the principle of Universal Sufficient Causation. According to the concept of Universal Suff